Visit Azul.com Support

26.01.0.0

Need help?
Schedule a consultation with an Azul performance expert.
Contact Us

26.01.0.0

Release Notes PDF

Release date: February 12, 2026

This CPU release is based on the Azul Zing Build of OpenJDK (Zing) 25.12.0.0 and corresponds to the following OpenJDK versions:

Major Version OpenJDK Version

8

1.8.0_481-b1

11

11.0.29.0.101+1-LTS

17

17.0.17.0.101+1-LTS

21

21.0.9.0.101+1-LTS

What’s New

  • January 2026 CPU release security fixes.

CVE fixes
CVE # Component Protocol Remote Exploit w/o Auth. Base Score Attack Vector Attack Complex Privileges Req’d User Interact Scope Confiden-tiality Integrity Availability Versions Affected Notes

CVE-2026-21945

Security

Multiple

Yes

7.5

Network

Low

None

None

Unchanged

None

None

High

25, 21, 17, 11, 8

Note 1

CVE-2026-21932

AWT, JavaFX

Multiple

Yes

7.4

Network

Low

None

Required

Changed

None

High

None

25, 21, 17, 11

Note 1

CVE-2026-21933

Networking

Multiple

Yes

6.1

Network

Low

None

Required

Changed

Low

Low

None

25, 21, 17, 11, 8

Note 2

CVE-2026-21925

RMI

Multiple

Yes

4.8

Network

High

None

None

Unchanged

Low

Low

None

25, 21, 17, 11, 8

Note 2

CVE-2025-43368 This CVE is not applicable to Azul Zing Builds of OpenJDK. It is listed here for comparison with other Java implementations which may contain this CVE.

JavaFX (WebKitGTK)

Multiple

Yes

7.5

Network

High

None

Required

Unchanged

High

High

High

None

Note 1

CVE-2025-7425 This CVE is not applicable to Azul Zing Builds of OpenJDK. It is listed here for comparison with other Java implementations which may contain this CVE.

JavaFX (libxslt)

Multiple

Yes

7.5

Network

High

None

Required

Unchanged

High

High

High

None

Note 1

CVE-2025-6021 This CVE is not applicable to Azul Zing Builds of OpenJDK. It is listed here for comparison with other Java implementations which may contain this CVE.

JavaFX (libxml2)

Multiple

Yes

5.9

Network

High

None

None

Unchanged

None

None

High

None

Note 1

CVE-2025-12183 This CVE is not applicable to Azul Zing Builds of OpenJDK. It is listed here for comparison with other Java implementations which may contain this CVE.

Mission Control (lz4-java)

Multiple

Yes

5.4

Network

Low

None

Required

Unchanged

Low

None

Low

None

Note 3

CVE-2025-6052 This CVE is not applicable to Azul Zing Builds of OpenJDK. It is listed here for comparison with other Java implementations which may contain this CVE.

JavaFX (glibc)

Multiple

Yes

3.7

Network

High

None

None

Unchanged

None

None

Low

None

Note 1

CVE-2025-47219 This CVE is not applicable to Azul Zing Builds of OpenJDK. It is listed here for comparison with other Java implementations which may contain this CVE.

JavaFX (gstreamer)

Multiple

Yes

3.1

Network

High

None

Required

Unchanged

Low

None

None

None

Note 2

CVE-2026-21947 This CVE is not applicable to Azul Zing Builds of OpenJDK. It is listed here for comparison with other Java implementations which may contain this CVE.

JavaFX

Multiple

Yes

3.1

Network

High

None

Required

Unchanged

None

Low

None

None

Note 1

Notes:

ID Notes

1

This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. This vulnerability does not apply to Java deployments, typically in servers, that load and run only trusted code (e.g., code installed by an administrator).

2

This vulnerability can be exploited by using APIs in the specified Component, e.g., through a web service which supplies data to the APIs. This vulnerability also applies to Java deployments, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security.

3

Azul Mission Control 9.1.1 is affected and is being updated and released separately

For more information about CVE and non-CVE security fixes in this release, refer to Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures Fixes for January 2026

Known Issues

Issue ID Description

ZVM-34474

Open JDK build number for JDK 8 is displayed incorrectly in java -version output.

Resolved Issues

There are no resolved issues associated with this release.